<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Martijn Boland</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn</link>
	<description>New adventures in .NET</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:52:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Paging demo for ASP.NET MVC 2 by Kim Cu Hoang</title>
		<link>http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn/2010/01/27/paging-demo-for-asp-net-mvc-2/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Cu Hoang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn/2010/01/27/paging-demo-for-asp-net-mvc-2/#comment-402</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your link, Martin.

Regards,
Kim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your link, Martin.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Kim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paging demo for ASP.NET MVC 2 by Webdiyer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn/2010/01/27/paging-demo-for-asp-net-mvc-2/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Webdiyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 01:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn/2010/01/27/paging-demo-for-asp-net-mvc-2/#comment-401</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your great work! I wrote a free asp.net mvc paging component called MvcPager too,it support both standard url paging and Ajax paging using MicrosoftAjax or jQuery script library,anyone interested in this component can view online demo and download it from http://en.webdiyer.com/mvcpager</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your great work! I wrote a free asp.net mvc paging component called MvcPager too,it support both standard url paging and Ajax paging using MicrosoftAjax or jQuery script library,anyone interested in this component can view online demo and download it from <a href="http://en.webdiyer.com/mvcpager" rel="nofollow">http://en.webdiyer.com/mvcpager</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paging demo for ASP.NET MVC 2 by martijn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn/2010/01/27/paging-demo-for-asp-net-mvc-2/comment-page-1/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>martijn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn/2010/01/27/paging-demo-for-asp-net-mvc-2/#comment-398</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-397&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Kim Cu &lt;/a&gt; 
Kim, check http://danieliglesiaseng.blogspot.com/2010/01/ajax-paging-with-aspnet-mvc.html for an AJAX version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-397" rel="nofollow">@Kim Cu </a><br />
Kim, check <a href="http://danieliglesiaseng.blogspot.com/2010/01/ajax-paging-with-aspnet-mvc.html" rel="nofollow">http://danieliglesiaseng.blogspot.com/2010/01/ajax-paging-with-aspnet-mvc.html</a> for an AJAX version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paging demo for ASP.NET MVC 2 by Kim Cu</title>
		<link>http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn/2010/01/27/paging-demo-for-asp-net-mvc-2/comment-page-1/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Cu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn/2010/01/27/paging-demo-for-asp-net-mvc-2/#comment-397</guid>
		<description>Hi Martijin,

I am using your paging, It&#039;s easy to use. But I want to use it with ajax, how can I do it? Kindly to guide me.

Thanks,
Kim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Martijin,</p>
<p>I am using your paging, It&#8217;s easy to use. But I want to use it with ajax, how can I do it? Kindly to guide me.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Kim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The risks of learning a SharePoint alternative by Nico Jansen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn/2010/02/03/the-risks-of-learning-a-sharepoint-alternative/comment-page-1/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Nico Jansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 20:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn/2010/02/03/the-risks-of-learning-a-sharepoint-alternative/#comment-395</guid>
		<description>Amen .... In dutch we would say .... je slaat de spijker op zijn kop ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen &#8230;. In dutch we would say &#8230;. je slaat de spijker op zijn kop &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Entity Framework 4.0: a fresh start (with demo application) by Bas ter Vrugt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn/2009/11/22/entity-framework-4-0-a-fresh-start-with-demo-application/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Bas ter Vrugt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn/2009/11/22/entity-framework-4-0-a-fresh-start-with-demo-application/#comment-365</guid>
		<description>good example.
generic repository registration can be done with the Generic Component Registration API.
more info:
http://blog.lozanotek.com/archive/2009/12/15/Injecting_Your_Favorite_IoC_Into_MVC_Turbine.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good example.<br />
generic repository registration can be done with the Generic Component Registration API.<br />
more info:<br />
<a href="http://blog.lozanotek.com/archive/2009/12/15/Injecting_Your_Favorite_IoC_Into_MVC_Turbine.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blog.lozanotek.com/archive/2009/12/15/Injecting_Your_Favorite_IoC_Into_MVC_Turbine.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One year after the Entity Framework Vote of No Confidence&#8230; by Martijn Boland &#187; Entity Framework 4.0: a fresh start (with demo application)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn/2009/09/24/one-year-after-the-entity-framework-vote-of-no-confidence/comment-page-1/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>Martijn Boland &#187; Entity Framework 4.0: a fresh start (with demo application)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn/2009/09/24/one-year-after-the-entity-framework-vote-of-no-confidence/#comment-345</guid>
		<description>[...] Entity Framework 1.0 pretty much sucks (compared to alternatives), but I’m glad to see that things have improved a lot in version 4.0. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Entity Framework 1.0 pretty much sucks (compared to alternatives), but I’m glad to see that things have improved a lot in version 4.0. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One year after the Entity Framework Vote of No Confidence&#8230; by Bas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn/2009/09/24/one-year-after-the-entity-framework-vote-of-no-confidence/comment-page-1/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Bas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn/2009/09/24/one-year-after-the-entity-framework-vote-of-no-confidence/#comment-326</guid>
		<description>I love to be in control of my code.
EF will generate a lot of crap.
Look at Model.designer.cs it always makes me laugh:
//This code was generated by a tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love to be in control of my code.<br />
EF will generate a lot of crap.<br />
Look at Model.designer.cs it always makes me laugh:<br />
//This code was generated by a tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One year after the Entity Framework Vote of No Confidence&#8230; by KristoferA</title>
		<link>http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn/2009/09/24/one-year-after-the-entity-framework-vote-of-no-confidence/comment-page-1/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>KristoferA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn/2009/09/24/one-year-after-the-entity-framework-vote-of-no-confidence/#comment-312</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-310&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-310&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;martijn &lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;Well, that’s more or less the point I’m trying to make: it’s pushed by MS so that developers are told by their management to use it. Managers don’t read about the flaws of Version 1.0.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
hmm. those &#039;managers&#039; would then fall under one or several of the following labels: incompetent (for not doing their due diligence, and for not listening to those who have), naïve (for taking marketing at face value -- do they also believe in laundry detergent TV commercials?), inexperienced (seen _any_ stable v1 product out of redmond? I haven&#039;t...).

oh well, it will be interesting to see what EFv3 brings, I expect it to be a lot better than v1...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-310"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-310" rel="nofollow">martijn </a> :</strong>Well, that’s more or less the point I’m trying to make: it’s pushed by MS so that developers are told by their management to use it. Managers don’t read about the flaws of Version 1.0.</p></blockquote>
<p>hmm. those &#8216;managers&#8217; would then fall under one or several of the following labels: incompetent (for not doing their due diligence, and for not listening to those who have), naïve (for taking marketing at face value &#8212; do they also believe in laundry detergent TV commercials?), inexperienced (seen _any_ stable v1 product out of redmond? I haven&#8217;t&#8230;).</p>
<p>oh well, it will be interesting to see what EFv3 brings, I expect it to be a lot better than v1&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One year after the Entity Framework Vote of No Confidence&#8230; by martijn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn/2009/09/24/one-year-after-the-entity-framework-vote-of-no-confidence/comment-page-1/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>martijn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.taiga.nl/martijn/2009/09/24/one-year-after-the-entity-framework-vote-of-no-confidence/#comment-311</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-306&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-306&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Danny Simmons&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’m sorry that you have had frustrations with the first release of the EF.  May I humbly suggest that you give the next release of the EF (the one that will ship with .net 4 and is available in beta form now) a chance before completely writing off the EF.  It’s certainly not perfect, but I hope you will find some significant improvements.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
From what I&#039;ve seen, the next version looks a whole lot better and I&#039;ll definitively will give it a good look. That aside, my frustrations are caused by the fact that the V1 version was positioned as the default way of doing data access and that many developers would be better off with an alternative solution that is available right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-306"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-306" rel="nofollow">Danny Simmons</a> :</strong></p>
<p>I’m sorry that you have had frustrations with the first release of the EF.  May I humbly suggest that you give the next release of the EF (the one that will ship with .net 4 and is available in beta form now) a chance before completely writing off the EF.  It’s certainly not perfect, but I hope you will find some significant improvements.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>From what I&#8217;ve seen, the next version looks a whole lot better and I&#8217;ll definitively will give it a good look. That aside, my frustrations are caused by the fact that the V1 version was positioned as the default way of doing data access and that many developers would be better off with an alternative solution that is available right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
